#Ui Emulator Install The ApiDemos

Ui Emulator Install The ApiDemos

We believe that testing on a real device, in usersвЂ™ hands, is the best way to get the comprehensive picture of how an app or mobile website will behave in the real world.However, we also recognize that many teams may not have the resources in place to completely rely on testing on real devices. From testing code in the development phase, to testing functionality, to testing device components and operating systems, mobile developers, testers and quality assurance teams have their work cut out for them.In response, many enterprise mobility professionals rely on simulators and/or emulators to expedite the testing process.At Mobile Labs, we have always advocated for testing on real mobile devices. Explore UI Automator Viewer Problem Solution.There never seems to be a shortage of components and features to test in enterprise mobility. Go to the location where you. One UI Design Guidelines.Open the Genymotion emulator and install the ApiDemos-debug.apk app on it.

Simulators and Emulators: What is the Difference?Although these terms are often used interchangeably, there is a marked difference between a simulator and an emulator. Checklist: Should I Use a Simulator/Emulator or a Real Device When Developing/Testing Mobile Applications?Click here to download a PDF version of this checklistAlthough this checklist is a useful resource to consult at a glance, it is important to dig deeper and to gain a better understanding of the relationship between simulators/emulators and real devices. But, while simulators and emulators certainly have their place in a mobile testing lab, there are certain tests that are best left to using real devices.How can you tell when a specific test or activity is best suited to be tested on a real device vs a simulator or emulator?Mobile Labs recently put together a checklist, Should I Use a Simulator/Emulator or a Real Device When Developing/Testing Mobile Applications?вЂќEnterprise mobility teams can use this checklist as a guide to determine what tests should be conducted using a real device or when a simulator or emulator can be an appropriate substitute.

Android uses the term emulator to describe their version of this program. In this host and guest arrangement, an emulator allows the host system to run software or use peripheral devices, such as printers or USB devices, that are designed for the guest system.But, for enterprise mobility professionals, the definitions of simulators and emulators are different based on whether you are dealing with Apple or Android.Apple uses the term simulator to describe their program that enables enterprise mobility professionals to run and test mobile apps on a computer without having to use a real device. While an emulator is hardware or software that allows one computer system (known as the host) to behave like another computer system (referred to as the guest).

Without enough real devices to go around, it is more cost-effective, not to mention efficient, for team members to use simulators and emulators for testing. #1: Not Every Organization Can Afford Multiple Real DevicesWith so many different devices on the market today, organizations sometimes cannot afford to buy and manage multiple versions of costly devices for developers and testers. Although Apple Simulator and Android Emulator are powerful, robust tools, they do not completely replicate the full experience of using an actual device by not taking into account hardware elements such as the battery, CPU, networking, etc.Below are a few reasons why enterprise mobility teams may choose to use an Apple Simulator and/or an Android Emulator as a substitute to testing on a real device. Why Use Simulators or Emulators?In a perfect world, with unlimited resources, testing on real devices is preferable.

With this simulation, testers can see how a page renders by screen size and can quickly make code changes and refresh the page to check the rendering. #5: Browser Simulation with Google Chrome for Mobile WebFor developers and testers working with mobile websites, using a simulator enables the use of Google Chrome for browser simulation. #4: Ability to Run Unit TestsBy using a simulator or an emulator, testers can run unit tests in a build system without having to use a real device. Running these tests on a simulator or an emulator enables teams to make any adjustments to code before committing it to the source code or to actual deployment. #3: Easy Debugging/Testing Before Code is Committed to Source and DeployedFor mobile developers, simulators and emulators enable teams to quickly verify the application state when certain UI events are triggered. In the mock up, quick tests can be conducted, such as testing different screen sizes to verify layouts, without having to have a real device with each screen size for testing.

Therefore, an app built for a simulator will not run on a real device as the architectures for the simulator are built for the Macintosh chips and the real devices are built for ARM chips.Developers and testers should run the app from Xcode and choose a simulator from the dropdown menu located by the run button, as seen below.For developing and testing for an Android device, developers and testers should run the app from Android Studio by hitting the run button. Android EmulatorFor mobility teams working with both Apple and Android, there are some key factors to consider when using Apple Simulator or Android Emulator.First, when working with iOS it is important to note that AppleвЂ™s code is compiled differently. Comparison: Apple Simulator v.

In addition to those differences, Simulator is an app running on a Mac and has access to the computerвЂ™s resources, including the CPU, memory, and network connection. It is also important to test your app on physical devices as there are hardware and API differences between a simulated device and a physical one. Real Device Testing = Real ResultsAlthough Apple Simulator and Android Emulator can help developers and testers quickly test certain elements of mobile apps and mobile websites before deployment, the majority of important tasks and tests are best suited to be tested on a real mobile device.Consider this excerpt from AppleвЂ™s Simulator Help Overview (emphasis added):вЂњSimulator is a great tool for rapid prototyping and development of your app allowing you to see the results of changes quickly, debug errors, and run tests.

#3: Use the Real Device Hardware Features for TestingThe best way to effectively test hardware features such as the deviceвЂ™s camera, GPS, battery, etc., is on the actual device itself. These different Operating Systems are not loaded into an Android Virtual Device, making testing just with an emulator virtually impossible. In this situation, enterprise mobility teams should use real Android devices, running a real OS across different manufacturers for the best results.Android Operating Systems are also different between manufacturers. #2: Influence of Manufacturer on Android DevicesBecause Android runs on several devices from different manufacturers, there can be different modifications by each vendor that Android Emulator may not be able to effectively test. Because a mobile app or mobile website uses the deviceвЂ™s CPU, memory and networking, running tests on a simulator or an emulator will not accurately predict the effect of these device elements on the mobile experience. Clearly, while simulators and emulators have their role in the mobile development and testing process, they should not be considered a replacement for testing on a real device.For real results and to get the most accurate insight into how an app or mobile website will function in the real world, enterprise mobility teams should test on real devices for the following reasons: #1: Testing on a Real Device Gives a True End-User ExperienceAs Apple noted in its Simulator Help Overview, there will be differences between a computerвЂ™s CPU, memory and network connections and those of a mobile device.

Mac Ui Emulator